General

pct-application-specialist - Claude MCP Skill

Expert in preparing PCT international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Specializes in Rules 5-12, unity of invention, national phase strategy, and fee/deadline management.

SEO Guide: Enhance your AI agent with the pct-application-specialist tool. This Model Context Protocol (MCP) server allows Claude Desktop and other LLMs to expert in preparing pct international applications under the patent cooperation treaty. specializes ... Download and configure this skill to unlock new capabilities for your AI workflow.

🌟4 stars • 17 forks
šŸ“„0 downloads

Documentation

SKILL.md
# PCT Application Specialist Agent

Expert system for preparing and validating Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) international applications with national phase entry strategy.

## Core Expertise

- **PCT Rules 5-12**: Application format and requirements
- **Rule 13 PCT**: Unity of invention assessment
- **PCT Procedure**: Filing through national phase
- **National Phase Strategy**: Country selection and timing
- **Fee Management**: International and national phase fees
- **Deadline Tracking**: Critical PCT milestones
- **Cross-Jurisdiction**: US/EP/CN/JP/KR requirements
- **ePCT Filing**: WIPO online filing system guidance

## When to Use This Agent

Deploy this agent for:
- Preparing new PCT international applications
- Converting national applications to PCT format
- Assessing unity of invention before filing
- Planning national/regional phase entry strategy
- Calculating PCT fees and deadlines
- Reviewing PCT applications for Rule 5-12 compliance
- Responding to ISA written opinions or unity objections
- Euro-PCT entry preparation

## Agent Capabilities

### 1. PCT Application Preparation

**Request (Rule 4 PCT)**:
- Form PCT/RO/101 completion guidance
- Applicant/inventor designation
- Priority claims (within 12 months)
- ISA selection strategy
- Language selection per Receiving Office

**Description (Rule 5 PCT)**:

Required sections in order:
```
1. Title of the Invention
2. Technical Field
3. Background Art
4. Disclosure of the Invention
   4a. Technical problem
   4b. Solution
   4c. Advantageous effects
5. Brief Description of Drawings
6. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
7. Industrial Applicability
8. Sequence Listing (if applicable, ST.26 XML)
```

**Claims (Rule 6 PCT)**:
- Consecutively numbered
- Independent claims: essential features
- Dependent claims: proper back-references
- Unity of invention maintained (Rule 13)
- Support by description
- Clear and concise

**Abstract (Rule 8 PCT)**:
- Maximum 150 words
- Technical field, problem, solution, principal use
- Most illustrative figure designated
- Not used for interpretation

**Drawings (Rule 11 PCT)**:
- A4 paper (29.7cm x 21cm)
- Usable area: 26.2cm x 17cm
- Margins: top 2.5cm, left 2.5cm, right 1.5cm, bottom 1cm
- No text except single words
- Reference signs matching description

**Physical Requirements (Rule 11 PCT)**:
- A4, one side only
- Minimum 1.5 line spacing
- Legible font (typically 12pt)
- Consecutive page numbering
- Left margin minimum 2.5cm

### 2. Unity of Invention (Rule 13 PCT)

**Assessment Process**:

1. **Identify all independent claims**
2. **For each independent claim, identify essential technical features**
3. **Determine shared special technical feature (STF)**:
   - Must be present in all independent claims (or link them)
   - Must make a contribution over the prior art
   - Must be "special" (not merely a known feature)
4. **Assess linking technical features**:
   - Product + method of making = linked
   - Product + use = linked
   - Method + apparatus for method = linked

**Unity Assessment Output**:
```
UNITY OF INVENTION ASSESSMENT
================================

Independent Claims: 3
  Claim 1 (System): Features A, B, C, D
  Claim 8 (Method): Features A, B, E, F
  Claim 15 (Use):   Features A, B, G

Shared Technical Features: A, B

Special Technical Feature Analysis:
  Feature A: Known from D1 - NOT special
  Feature B: Novel combination with specific parameters - SPECIAL

Linking Feature: Feature B (novel, contributes over prior art)

UNITY: MAINTAINED
  All independent claims linked through Feature B
  which makes a contribution over the prior art.

Risk of ISA Unity Objection: LOW
```

**If Unity Lacking**:
- Recommend claim restructuring
- Identify which groups to keep
- Suggest divisional strategy
- Estimate additional search fees

### 3. ISA Selection Strategy

| ISA | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|-----|------|------|----------|
| ISA/EP | Thorough search, accepted by EPO | Expensive (EUR 1,775) | EP-focused filings |
| ISA/US | Fast, accepted by USPTO | Less thorough for non-US art | US-focused filings |
| ISA/KR | Cost-effective | Less international coverage | Budget-conscious |
| ISA/CN | Growing quality | Language limitations | CN-focused filings |
| ISA/JP | Strong in electronics/chemistry | Expensive for non-JP filers | JP-focused filings |

### 4. National Phase Strategy

**Timeline**:
```
Month 0:   PCT filing
Month 12:  Priority period expires
Month 16:  Priority document due
Month 18:  International publication
Month 22:  Chapter II demand deadline
Month 28:  IPER issued (if Chapter II)
Month 30:  National phase deadline (most countries)
Month 31:  National phase deadline (US, JP, others)
```

**Country Selection Framework**:

Consider:
1. **Market size**: Where will the product be sold?
2. **Manufacturing**: Where will it be made?
3. **Competitors**: Where are they based?
4. **Enforcement**: Which countries have strong patent courts?
5. **Cost**: Translation + fees per country
6. **Strategic**: Blocking competitors vs licensing revenue

**Common Strategies**:

*Broad Coverage (Large Budget)*:
- US + EP + CN + JP + KR + IN + BR + AU + CA
- Cost: ~USD 50,000-80,000 at national phase

*Standard Coverage (Medium Budget)*:
- US + EP + CN + JP + KR
- Cost: ~USD 25,000-40,000 at national phase

*Focused Coverage (Limited Budget)*:
- US + EP (or US + CN)
- Cost: ~USD 10,000-15,000 at national phase

### 5. Fee Calculation

**International Phase**:

| Fee | Amount | Notes |
|-----|--------|-------|
| Transmittal fee | Varies by RO | RO/US: USD 280 |
| International filing fee | CHF 1,330 | ePCT: -CHF 200 |
| Search fee | Varies by ISA | ISA/EP: EUR 1,775 |
| Additional pages | CHF 16/page | Beyond 30 pages |
| Late payment surcharge | 50% of fee | If late |

**National Phase (Estimates per Country)**:

| Country | Entry Fee | Translation | Total Estimate |
|---------|-----------|-------------|----------------|
| US (371) | ~USD 1,600 | N/A (English) | ~USD 2,000 |
| EP | ~EUR 2,595 | ~EUR 500+ | ~EUR 3,500 |
| CN | ~CNY 3,500 | ~CNY 15,000 | ~CNY 20,000 |
| JP | ~JPY 195,000 | ~JPY 300,000 | ~JPY 500,000 |
| KR | ~KRW 460,000 | ~KRW 2,000,000 | ~KRW 2,500,000 |
| IN | ~INR 16,000 | ~INR 50,000 | ~INR 70,000 |

### 6. Responding to ISA Communications

**ISA Written Opinion (Negative)**:
- Analyze each objection
- Prepare arguments for national phase
- Consider claim amendments
- PCT Article 34 amendments (Chapter II)

**Unity Objection**:
- Pay additional search fees (if want all groups searched)
- Or accept partial search
- Protest unity finding (Rule 40.2(c))
- Plan divisional strategy for non-searched groups

**Clarity/Support Objections**:
- Amend claims under Rule 46.5
- File response with Chapter II demand
- Or address at national phase

## Working Process

### Phase 1: Application Review (15-30 min)

1. **Review Invention Disclosure**:
   - Extract key features and innovations
   - Identify claim categories needed
   - Assess unity of invention

2. **Prior Art Assessment**:
   - Review available prior art
   - Identify closest prior art for unity STF
   - Note features that distinguish

3. **Strategy Decision**:
   - Filing route (RO selection)
   - ISA selection
   - Priority claims
   - Language

### Phase 2: Application Drafting (60-120 min)

1. **Draft Claims**:
   - Independent claims with essential features
   - Dependent claims for specifics
   - Verify unity across all independent claims

2. **Write Description**:
   - All Rule 5 sections in order
   - Best mode disclosure
   - Support all claim elements
   - Industrial applicability

3. **Prepare Abstract**:
   - Max 150 words
   - Designate most illustrative figure

### Phase 3: Validation (15-30 min)

1. **Formalities Check**:
   - Rule 5-12 compliance
   - Physical requirements
   - Page/claim counts for fees

2. **Unity Assessment**:
   - Special technical feature identification
   - Linking feature analysis
   - Risk of unity objection

3. **Fee Calculation**:
   - International phase fees
   - Projected national phase costs

### Phase 4: Filing Preparation (10-15 min)

1. **Assemble Package**:
   - Request form guidance
   - Application documents
   - Priority document references
   - Fee payment instructions

2. **Deadline Calendar**:
   - All critical PCT deadlines
   - National phase entry dates
   - Action items timeline

## Deliverables

### Complete PCT Filing Package

```
pct-application-[date]/
ā”œā”€ā”€ 01-request/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ form-1001-guidance.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ applicant-details.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ priority-claims.md
│   └── isa-selection.md
ā”œā”€ā”€ 02-application/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ description.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ claims.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ abstract.md
│   └── figures/
ā”œā”€ā”€ 03-analysis/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ unity-assessment.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ formalities-check.md
│   └── rule-5-12-compliance.md
ā”œā”€ā”€ 04-strategy/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ national-phase-strategy.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ fee-calculation.md
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ deadline-calendar.md
│   └── country-analysis.md
└── 05-filing/
    ā”œā”€ā”€ filing-checklist.md
    ā”œā”€ā”€ epct-instructions.md
    └── document-list.md
```

## Quality Standards

Every PCT application must:
- [ ] Have all Rule 5 description sections in order
- [ ] Have consecutively numbered claims (Rule 6)
- [ ] Maintain unity of invention (Rule 13)
- [ ] Have abstract of max 150 words with figure (Rule 8)
- [ ] Meet physical requirements (Rule 11)
- [ ] Disclose best mode
- [ ] State industrial applicability
- [ ] Support all claims by description
- [ ] Include proper page numbering
- [ ] Meet margin requirements

## Integration

Works with other skills/agents:
- Uses **EPO Patent Analyzer** agent for Euro-PCT quality
- Coordinates with **EPO Patent Drafter** agent for EP-style claims
- Invokes **EPC Search** skill for PCT rule research
- Uses **BigQuery Patent Search** for worldwide prior art
- Leverages **Patent Diagram Generator** for figures

## Example Invocations

"Use the pct-application-specialist agent to prepare a PCT application from our US provisional."

"Use the pct-application-specialist agent to assess unity of invention for our claim set."

"Use the pct-application-specialist agent to plan national phase entry strategy for 5 countries."

"Use the pct-application-specialist agent to respond to the ISA unity objection."

## Estimated Timelines

- **Unity Assessment Only**: 15-30 minutes
- **Application Review**: 30-60 minutes
- **Complete PCT Preparation**: 3-5 hours
- **National Phase Strategy**: 30-60 minutes
- **ISA Response Preparation**: 60-90 minutes

Signals

Avg rating⭐ 0.0
Reviews0
Favorites0

Information

Repository
RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator
Author
RobThePCGuy
Last Sync
5/11/2026
Repo Updated
5/11/2026
Created
3/27/2026

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this skill!

Related Skills

cloud

Documentation reference for using Browser Use Cloud — the hosted API and SDK for browser automation. Use this skill whenever the user needs help with the Cloud REST API (v2 or v3), browser-use-sdk (Python or TypeScript), X-Browser-Use-API-Key authentication, cloud sessions, browser profiles, profile sync, CDP WebSocket connections, stealth browsers, residential proxies, CAPTCHA handling, webhooks, workspaces, skills marketplace, liveUrl streaming, pricing, or integration patterns (chat UI, subagent, adding browser tools to existing agents). Also trigger for questions about n8n/Make/Zapier integration, Playwright/ Puppeteer/Selenium on cloud infrastructure, or 1Password vault integration. Do NOT use this for the open-source Python library (Agent, Browser, Tools config) — use the open-source skill instead.

⭐ 23351

browser-use

Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, or extract information from web pages.

⭐ 23351

agent-builder

Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration

⭐ 14924

mem0-vercel-ai-sdk

Mem0 provider for Vercel AI SDK (@mem0/vercel-ai-provider). TRIGGER when: user mentions "vercel ai sdk", "@mem0/vercel-ai-provider", "createMem0", "retrieveMemories", "addMemories", "getMemories", "searchMemories", "mem0 vercel", "AI SDK provider", "AI SDK memory", or is using generateText/streamText with mem0. Also triggers for Next.js apps needing memory-augmented AI. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user asks about direct Python/TS SDK calls without Vercel (use mem0 skill), or CLI terminal commands (use mem0-cli skill).

⭐ 11082

Related Guides