hive-wallet-investigation - Claude MCP Skill

# hive-wallet-investigation — Wallet Investigation

Investigate a wallet's balances, transfers, PnL, NFT exposure, DeFi positions,
and notable activity with live Hive data, scoped to exactly what the user
asked.

## Task toolset and identifiers

Toolset: `wallet_investigation`. Read
`hive://toolsets/wallet_investigation` before execution; it is authoritative
for the current output schema, material-call budget, phases, fallback
condition, and stop conditions.

- Required: wallet address and chain/network — unless the user explicitly asks
  for multi-chain.
- Optional: time window, asset filter, counterparty, protocol, NFT collection.

Ask for the chain when an EVM address appears without context: the same
address exists on every EVM chain with different state, so guessing the chain
silently changes the answer. For Solana wallets, hand off to
`hive-solana-analysis`.

Before choosing endpoints, select exactly one matching entry from the exact
workflow's routes[]. Follow its ordered steps, use a fallback only under that
step's published condition, stop at four material calls, and preserve the
selected route_id in the typed result. The broad coverageCatalog is discovery
coverage, not an execution plan.

## Procedure

1. Validate the address format for the requested chain.
2. Call `search_tools` for wallet balance, native balance, transfer, NFT,
   DeFi-position, and PnL capabilities as the question requires.
3. Call `get_api_endpoint_schema` for each endpoint before calling it.
4. Call `invoke_api_endpoint` with schema-valid, bounded arguments.
5. Start with balances and native balance. Add transfers for activity
   questions; add NFTs, DeFi positions, or PnL only when relevant.
6. Summarize exposure, concentration, notable activity, and missing data.

## Bounded calls

- Use explicit `limit`, `page`, `per_page`, or time filters for transfers.
- Do not fetch full history for a quick portfolio read.
- Avoid mixing chains unless the user requested multi-chain analysis.

## Worked example

User: "What does 0x28C6c06298d514Db089934071355E5743bf21d60 hold on Ethereum,
and did anything big move this week?"

1. `search_tools` → `{"query": "wallet token balances native balance transfers ethereum", "limit": 5}`
2. `get_api_endpoint_schema` for the balance and transfer endpoints returned.
3. `invoke_api_endpoint` for balances first, then transfers with a 7-day
   window and an explicit limit — argument names come from the schema, not
   from memory.
4. Answer with the report template, flagging spam tokens and truncated
   history.

## Report template

```markdown
## Summary
[Wallet posture and the most notable finding.]

## Calls made
- Toolset: wallet_investigation
- Endpoint(s): [exact endpoint names]
- Identifiers: [chain, wallet, filters]

## Evidence
- Balances: [native + top token holdings]
- Activity: [transfers in window, counterparties]
- Exposure: [NFTs, DeFi positions, PnL if requested]
- Provenance: [provider, fetched_at, observed_at/cache_age_ms, runtime status per call]

## Caveats
[Missing chains, truncated history, unavailable enrichment, degraded providers.]

## Next action
[Chain expansion, transfer drilldown, risk check, or PnL detail — only if needed.]
```

## Gotchas

- Wallet labels and owner identity are not guaranteed.
- Token balances can include spam or illiquid assets — say so rather than
  inflating portfolio value.
- Absence of DeFi/NFT data may reflect provider coverage, not true absence.

## Evidence receipt (required)

End every Hive-backed answer with a compact receipt built from the `_hive`
object on each material tool response:

- `provider`, `tool`, `fetched_at`, `observed_at`, `cache_age_ms`, and `runtime_status`
- `receipt_id`, `receipt_version`, server/build version, and SHA-256 input/result
  digests when present (self-checks, not signatures)
- `source`, `cache_status`, `truncated`, and any warnings
- canonical chain/entity identifiers plus block, slot, transaction, or query ids
  present in provider data
- material provider disagreements and how they were handled
- checks that were unavailable, gated, stale, truncated, or intentionally not run
- a `claims[]` citation from each material statement to exact receipt IDs
- one `coverage[]` entry for every canonical evidence phase, with each gap explained

Never turn missing evidence into a clean result, silently merge conflicting
provider values, or omit a degraded/fallback call from the receipt.
`observed_at` is Hive's first-observation/original cache-population time, and
`cache_age_ms: 0` only means newly retrieved by Hive. Use provider time, block,
slot, transaction, or candle close for source recency; if absent, mark it
unknown. Run `validate_task_result` before presenting the typed workflow result;
it checks structure but cannot authenticate an invented receipt.

## Runtime status handling

Classify provider failures as `invalid_input`, `missing_key`, `plan_required`,
`rate_limited`, `degraded`, or `failing`. A single blocked enrichment tool should not suppress
balances or transfers that did succeed.

## Hand-offs

- Solana wallet (base58 address) → `hive-solana-analysis`.
- "Is this address dangerous / phishing / sanctioned" → `hive-security-risk`.
- Token-specific deep dive on one holding → `hive-token-diligence`.