Data & AI
codex-coworker - Claude MCP Skill
Invoke Codex as a coworker for implementation, brainstorming, specs, and reviews. Use when you want parallel thinking, cheap execution, or a second opinion. Codex tokens are cheaper than yours — delegate aggressively. Keywords: codex, delegate, implement, draft, review, brainstorm, write tests, code review.
SEO Guide: Enhance your AI agent with the codex-coworker tool. This Model Context Protocol (MCP) server allows Claude Desktop and other LLMs to invoke codex as a coworker for implementation, brainstorming, specs, and reviews. use when you want ... Download and configure this skill to unlock new capabilities for your AI workflow.
🌟1 stars • 1 forks
📥0 downloads
Documentation
SKILL.md# Codex as Coworker Codex is a capable senior engineer you can delegate to. Think of it as having a coworker who can: - Draft specs while you think through architecture - Implement code based on patterns you've identified - Review your work for bugs and edge cases - Write tests for code you've written - Brainstorm approaches to a problem Your tokens are expensive and limited. Codex tokens are cheap. Delegate aggressively. ## Invocation **Primary: CLI** ```bash codex exec --full-auto "Implement X following the pattern in Y. Run pnpm typecheck after." \ --output-last-message /tmp/codex-out.md 2>/dev/null # Then validate via: git diff --stat, pnpm test, or read summary only if needed ``` **Interactive session for complex problems:** ```bash codex "Let's design the data model for this feature" ``` ## Token Economics Your output tokens cost 5x your input tokens. Codex tokens are separate. - Codex generates 1000 tokens of code → costs Codex, not you - You read Codex's output → input tokens (cheap) - You generate same code yourself → output tokens (expensive) **Net savings: ~80% on code generation by delegating to Codex.** To maximize savings: 1. Have Codex write to files directly 2. Validate by running tests or checking `git diff --stat` 3. Only read full output when debugging failures ## Reasoning Effort Vary reasoning effort based on task complexity: | Task | Effort | When | |------|--------|------| | Simple edits, boilerplate | `medium` | Getters, CRUD, obvious changes | | Most implementation (default) | `high` | Features, refactors, tests | | Complex debugging, architecture | `xhigh` | Race conditions, security, hard bugs | ```bash codex exec --full-auto -c model_reasoning_effort=xhigh "Debug this race condition" ``` Default to `high`. Drop to `medium` for trivial work. Escalate to `xhigh` for genuinely hard problems. ## When to Delegate **Good candidates:** - Implementation from a clear spec or pattern - Writing tests for existing code - Code review and analysis - Drafting specs for you to refine - Exploring multiple approaches in parallel - Boilerplate and CRUD operations - Refactoring with clear before/after **Keep for yourself:** - Novel architecture decisions - Deep codebase reasoning you've already done - Integration across unfamiliar systems - Anything requiring context you already have loaded - Quick one-liners where overhead isn't worth it ## Parallel Work You can think while Codex works: - Have Codex draft code while you design the architecture - Have Codex write tests while you implement - Get Codex's review while you plan the next step ## Trust but Verify Always review Codex output before committing. Run tests. Check it fits codebase patterns. Codex is good but not infallible. ## Context Passing Give Codex enough context to succeed: - Reference specific files or patterns to follow - Include relevant constraints - Be specific about what you want Bad: "Write a user service" Good: "Implement a UserService class following the pattern in src/services/AuthService.ts. Include CRUD operations for users with proper error handling." ## Pre-Delegation Checklist Before delegating, ask yourself: 1. **Does this file have existing tests?** → Add to prompt: "Don't break existing tests in [test file]" 2. **Should Codex ADD or REPLACE?** → Be explicit: "ADD to this file" vs "REPLACE this file" → Default to ADD unless rewrite is intentional 3. **What quality gates should Codex run?** → Include: "Run pnpm typecheck && pnpm lint after changes" 4. **What patterns should Codex follow?** → Include: "Follow the pattern in [reference file]" ## Prompt Templates ### Adding to existing file (safest): ``` ADD a new [function/component] to [file]. Follow the pattern used in [reference]. Don't modify existing functions. Run pnpm typecheck after. ``` ### Replacing/rewriting (use cautiously): ``` REPLACE [file] with [new implementation]. Note: This file has tests in [test file] - ensure they still pass. Run pnpm typecheck && pnpm lint after. ``` ### New file from scratch: ``` Create [file] implementing [spec]. Follow patterns from [reference]. Run pnpm typecheck after. ``` ### With quality gates (recommended): ```bash codex exec "ADD [function] to [file]. Follow pattern in [ref]. \ Don't break tests in [test file]. Run pnpm typecheck after." \ --output-last-message /tmp/codex-out.md 2>/dev/null ``` ## Post-Delegation Validation After Codex completes: 1. **Check what changed:** ```bash git diff --stat ``` 2. **Run quality gates:** ```bash pnpm typecheck && pnpm lint ``` 3. **Run tests:** ```bash pnpm test ``` 4. **If tests broke:** - Check if Codex deleted/renamed functions tests depend on - Look for wholesale file replacement when ADD was intended - Review imports that may have been removed 5. **Review integration points:** - You handle complex integration across files - Check redirects, configs, and cross-file dependencies See `/delegate` for full orchestration patterns.
Signals
Avg rating⭐ 0.0
Reviews0
Favorites0
Information
- Repository
- phrazzld/claude-config
- Author
- phrazzld
- Last Sync
- 3/2/2026
- Repo Updated
- 3/1/2026
- Created
- 1/19/2026
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this skill!